If you're using Chrome, the right column of this blog isn't displaying correctly. Switch to Firefox. If you're using the iPad, you're a tool. If you're using IE, go kill yourself.
(This person is kinda upset that I dissed their favorite browser. I actually use Chrome and I like it, but for some reason the layout here is different than on Firefox. And of course, the iPad and IE just plain suck. You tool.)

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Oxford comma

An Oxford comma is a comma that precedes the words and or or, when those conjunctions come before the final item in a list of three or more words. Confusing? Here's an example:

Teams that suck: Cowboys, Mavs, and Rangers.

The Oxford comma is the one right after Mavs. Some people would choose to write it like this:

Teams that suck: Cowboys, Mavs and Rangers.

These two sentences aren't so hard to understand, but take a look at this one:

...Nelson Mandela, an 800-year-old demigod and a dildo collector.

The writer of this piece meant to say that there were three people involved, but the unsuspecting reader would think that the writer was being a jackass in saying that Mandela is an ancient deity who likes to stick things up his vagina (don't judge). It would be easier if the writer had just inserted a comma after the word demigod. That may not eliminate all potential confusion, however. If the sentence were:

...Nelson Mandela, an 800-year-old demigod, and a dildo collector.

then one might suppose that the writer thinks Mandela is an 800-year-old demigod, although he would be excluded from the possibility of being a dildo collector.

My take: use the fucking Oxford comma. It saves so much trouble. Even in the last example, who the hell would seriously believe that the author wants to say that Mandela is a demigod? It just gets to common sense when small ambiguities like that occur.

0 comments: